CrokinoleCentre: CrokinoleCentre Rankings

Who Won These Old Crokinole Tournaments?

October 23, 2026

Recently I acted on a long desire to be a better informed citizen by buying a subscription to my local newspaper. This should not be an action worth remarking on, but when I’ve mentioned it in passing has typically been met with a “why would you do that?” response from similarly aged citizens. But the value of local journalism is the not the subject here, as an unexpected benefit of my newspaper subscription has been getting access to the full archive of The Waterloo Record and its predecessors.

It would not surprise you to know the first thing I looked for was historic news on crokinole. And I was delighted by the results.

Among them I found clippings about the Ontario Championships, Canadian Championships, and the JC Classic.

One goal of launching Crokinole Reference was to provide a home for crokinole not just in the NCA history, but from anywhere and anytime. So let’s take a look and try to find out who won these old tournaments.

We start in 1960, which seems to be the origin of the Ontario Crokinole Championships.

1960

Waterloo Record article — Source: 1960-Mar-19 Kitchener-Waterloo Record - Pg 7

We see Clayton Reibling won against Samuel Hurst in a playoff. The format of the tournament is unclear, suggesting they played head-to-head matches in the preliminary, which necessitated the playoff. One of names mentioned is David Brubacher, which is of course not the elite cues player we know today, but rather a stalwart of the early St. Jacobs club years. He won the club title eight times in nine years from 1960 to 1968.

1961

1961 comes with a photo and a good deal of description. This edition allowed both cues and fingers players side-by-side, with the final match being won 11-9, seemingly in a “race” format similar to what we see today. That’s one of a few similarities to today. There’s a comment about game-strategy (“played the final button away from the hole and forced Wayne away from the final 20 points”), and a comment about open-20 success (“Top players can score a 20 . . . 80 per cent of the time”).

One notable difference though is that rounds of crokinole were played with 10 discs, so the standardizing of 8-disc singles rounds does not date back to 1961.

We see too a reference to the E. S. Otto Cup. This was a local men’s wear company that was approached by Howard Martin to sponsor the tournament.

Also mentioned in this article is Oscar Weber, who is still very much active in the crokinole scene, having won the Cues World Championship last year.

1962

In 1962 we see categories for singles and doubles, and fingers and cues. Interestingly we see Howard Gimbel finished second in cues and first in fingers. I wonder how common it was in that era for a player to be proficient in both.

1963

In 1963 we see the first reference to Leo Gaessler. Gaessler has a certain mythology about him, as only a few crokinole players around today have stories about him, but every story is about how great he was at crokinole. Israel Bowman is one of the names associated with the origins of the St. Jacobs Club, along with Laverne Wittich. Also it appears the championship match was a marathon affair with a score of 20-16, the equivalent of 4.5 full games.

The article says the invite for the tournament was sent to every club in Ontario, but we can note that the hometown of every player so far is some location quite close to St. Jacobs. The furtherest towns mentioned in any of articles so far are Bridgeport and Kitchener. For modern driving routes, travel time would be less than 20 minutes for these locations. Whether the famed Preston Crokinole Club was in attendance at these events is not clear until 1966.

1966

We skip two years, but fortunately are informed that Gaessler won all of the intervening years of the tournament.

With 29 entrants into the tournament there was a complete 28-game-round-robin, making 224 total points available. Gaessler averaged 5.5 points per game to win the title.

Bob Mader is mentioned in third place, and is our first confirmed member of the Preston Crokinole Club making an appearance at the tournament. Bob Mader finished 3rd in the Preston Club standings in 1966, and then won the Preston Club 17 times in 18 years between 1967 and 1984.

Laverne Reibling is also mentioned here. He lived in the area prior to moving closer to Tavistock. Many years later he’d be on the very first committee that originated the World Crokinole Championship event.

1968

Not much info available in 1968, but Gaessler won again, averaging 5.9 points per game over the total of 33 games played. 33 games! These must have been some long days, but I have heard previously that 6-discs per round used to be common for some tournaments, so perhaps they weren’t 8 or 10-disc rounds.

1969

Bob Mader’s brother, Reg, won the title in 1969 with 5.6 points per game over 31 games.

1970

Now in 1970, Bob Mader wins the Ontario title for the first time. With scores of 36 and 34 out of a possible 60 it’s not so clear what the format of the tournament was. 60 points is only 7.5 games of 8-points each. Perhaps they played 12-point games, 5 in total, in a 6-player A-pool final.

1972

We skip past 1971 to see Gaessler win again, this time in a 31-game-round robin, where he averaged 5.9 points per game, and just barely beat Roy Roth for the title. This article gives makes the first mention of Hugh Kidnie, who was a long-time St. Jacobs Club player, and another Mader-brother in Richard.

1980

Then unfortunately we have nothing until 1980, which is where the current edition of the Ontario Singles Championships trophy starts from. Roy Roth wins in 1980, ahead of Leo Gaessler. The two had likely been competing fiercely for the both the Ontario and St. Jacobs Club titles in those intervening years. Gaessler had won the St. Jacobs title every year between 1969 and 1978, except for two years, one won by Hugh Kidnie and the other by Roy Roth. Roth then proceeded to win the St. Jacobs title every year between 1979 and 1986.

Overall Ontario Statistics

So now we have a fuller, but still not complete, picture of the history of this illustrious event. From 1980 onward the engraving on the current winner's trophy give us the list of past champions.

From 1960 to 2026 there’s 67 possible annual editions of the event, but it didn’t run for three years due to covid (2020-2022) and two years in a gap in momentum with the old tournament and the revitalization due to the creation of the NCA (2007-2008). So that reduces it to 62 likely editions of the event.

We are still missing results from 1967, 1971, 1973-1979, and 1983. If we ever got our hands on the E. S. Otto trophy we might be able to fill in some of the missing pieces. Unfortunately without the 1979 results (the last year the trophy was used), we don’t even know who might have last been in possession of it.

Fortunately we do the know the results of 52 of the 62 Ontario Singles Championships. For those known results, here’s an updated look at the records for the players with the most wins in the tournament’s history.

The all time wins list of the Ontario Championships

From our known results, Justin Slater still stands on top. Although a lot of the missing years are in the era when Gaessler and Roth were active and could have racked up a few more victories. But until such time as the past reveals more of its secrets, this is the story we have about the Ontario Singles Championships.

Cameron Heights Events

The Ontario Championships were not the only reports I found in the archives. Fortunately someone was sending to the newspaper the results of the legendary tournaments that took place at Cameron Heights High School in Kitchener.

1994

Here we have a report from 1994 of the 6th edition of the JC Crokinole Classic. This was an event made up only of teachers at the school, and if the reporting is accurate, started first in 1989. We see the second-seeded team of Jon Conrad and partner Mark Seupersaud won ahead of Joe King and Elvis Husic, with the four of them then off to the Schneider Haus event following April of 1995. The first year of the Schneider Haus event was in 1993, but the Cameron Heights team wasn’t included until the following year. They promptly won three-straight titles when they joined the event.

1995

In 1995 there’s the first mention of the Canadian Crokinole Championships, which was organized by Jon Conrad and ran at Cameron Heights. The event was a doubles tournament using traditional Cameron Heights rules, which most notably did not allow combination shots (in other words, your shooting disc had to directly strike an opposing disc), but did allow the twiddle (when your disc is held straight-up and then flicked, allowing it to spin around on its edge). Bill Freeman and Dan Shantz were a top doubles team in the early years of the World Championships, and they were clearly a force in 1995, winning this event ahead of Conrad and Seupersaud.

1996

In 1996, Tony Snyder and Paul Hartman defeated Conrad/Seupersaud for the title of the Jaycee Crokinole Classic. I guess no one told the newspaper editor that JC stood for Jon Conrad. Hartman and Snyder would also become well known names in the World Championship results, particularly in the early years.

And our last entry is of Conrad/Seupersaud winning the Canadian Championships against Snyder/Hartman.

I don’t have any more results from those events, but would be happy to accept any contributions to I could later add them to the Crokinole Reference database.

There may not be any newspaper clipping of the results, but the 1997 JC Crokinole Classic was documented in a literal documentary. We are grateful to Jon Conrad for making such a video available, which can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KsGbHW1QQbE.

WCC Seating Explained

March 6, 2026

For many years the World Crokinole Championship (WCC) has used a simple method for rotating players through the preliminary round:

every player gets a scorecard colour, and a starting table number to play their first game
After each game the players with one coloured scorecard move up in table numbers, and the players with the other coloured scorecards move down

Given that the WCC preliminary round involves three categories and around 300 players (and the possibility of any of those 300 players being a no-show without warning), it’s probably the only rotation methodology that can be used to get the preliminary round completed without encountering several instances of chaos, confusion, and time wasting.

The long-known downside of the WCC preliminary round is that the rotation methodology results in everyone playing a unique set of opponents, such as in the 2025 competitive singles event where everyone would have played a unique set of 10 out of a possible 127 opponents. This is of course in contrast to many other tournaments where the field is split into groups, and everyone within the same group plays the same set of the opponents. So the WCC methodology is a ripe opportunity for some players to get an advantage/disadvantage by playing a relatively weak/strong set of opponents.

In the WCC events prior to 2024, players randomly drew their table number and colour as they entered the playing area, and it was frequent to see players, like myself, craning their necks to look down the line at who their set of opponents would be. Sometimes I’d see a lot of familiar faces and start to feel poorly about my chances, and sometimes I’d see a bunch of unknown faces and count myself lucky.

Of course, having the qualifiers of the World Championship preliminary round being influenced by random chance of opponents is not ideal.

So when I took over the registrations of the WCC in 2024, it was something I looked to change. And how I did that will be explained now.

Understanding the WCC Rotation

When a tournament separates players into groups and sets up a rotation with either a bye (in the case of an odd number of players in the group), or an anchor (in the case of an even number), it’s easy to see the rotation results in every player facing every opponent for one game.

Image showing rotation of players in a single group where everyone plays each other.

After your first opponent, you play every second player in the line until you’ve completed the entire cycle.

And if you want to make your round robins fair, in the sense that you’d like the each player’s quality of opponents to be the same or very similar, this can be accomplished by ensuring each group has an equal number of strong players in it.

The WCC rotation is more complex to understand. After you draw a scorecard colour (say blue), you’d only play opponents who have a white scorecard, and if your starting table number is an even number you’d only play opponents who had a starting table number that was also even (and vice versa for odd). (The exception to this rule is if there are an odd number of tables in the entire preliminary round, in which case players who loop around from table 1 to the highest numbered table would at some point switch to facing opponents of opposite even/odd number starting points.)

The result is the WCC rotation creates 4 separate cycles of possible opponents, of which everyone plays their own unique slice of 10 opponents (if playing 10 games). (If it’s an odd number of tables then there’s 2 separate cycles of possible opponents.) Which cycle of opponents you play, and where in that cycle your opponents are, depends on your scorecard colour and starting table number.

The image below shows how a 20 table rotation creates these 4 cycles, with each opponent denoted by their starting table number. A player starts by facing an opponent of the opposite scorecard colour and their same starting table number, and then progresses either clockwise or counterclockwise around the cycle until all prescribed games in the round are played.

Image showing rotation of players in a Tavistock style preliminary round.

Now knowing this, the challenge for creating a fair preliminary round with X number of games, requires that each cycle has an equal quality of player strengths, and that each cycle is ordered in such a way that every partition of the cycle into a length of X results in the same quality of player strength.

If that sounds complicated to you, you can be rest assured that it is. Graph theory fundamentals were covered in my mathematics undergrad, but we didn’t address the travelling salesmen problem, let alone this much more difficult challenge of finding a path through a complete graph that visits all nodes but also has edge weights with similar costs when you divide the path into partitions.

But fortunately if you let go of the idea of getting a mathematically perfect solution, something I did after a couple weeks of mulling this over, you can come up with a pretty good solution that doesn’t involve doctorate-level mathematics.

How the Seats Were Assigned

Last year the approach was to divide all players (or teams, in the case of doubles) into 5 groups: Tier 1, Tier 2, Tier 3, Tier 4, and finally, unseeded. Tier 1 would compose of the best players entered into the competition, while Tier 2 would be the next set of top players, followed by Tier 3 and Tier 4. The unseeded group would represent those without a pedigree among the players in Tiers 1 to 4, or those for who no tournament performance was known.

Having tiered the players, they were then distributed into cycles and ordered so that players of different tiers were distributed sequentially. It was completely random where players within a particular Tier would reside, so long as they were in a spot that should be held by their Tier.

In doubles the cycles were constructed with unseeded teams in every second position, and tiered teams then filling in those gaps in the order of Tier 4, Tier 3, Tier 2, and then Tier 1. In singles the cycles were constructed with two unseeded players followed by a tiered player throughout the cycle, with those tiered players ordered 4, 3, 2, and 1, as in the doubles case.

Image showing hte cycles with certain nodes designated by a tier.

The result in the doubles case is that every team, regardless of starting position, plays one team in each of Tier 1, 2, 3 and 4, as well as four unseeded teams (since they play 8 games). For singles, every player played three or four tiered players, of which those were all players of different tiers (as they play 10 games in singles).

So long as you establish the tiers in a good way, this approach is effective in balancing the preliminary round for all players.

For simplicity sake, in 2026 the singles seating will be modified to include 5 Tiers with the Tiered players seated every second seat such that everyone should play precisely 5 tiered players in their 10-game round robin.

Uncertain numbers

There’s a challenge to running every crokinole tournament, which is you can’t be certain everyone will actually show up to make the number of competitors exactly as expected. This is an even greater challenge with the World Championships because the number of people attending is so much larger.

It’s common that up to 5 people registered for a category do not attend, and we only learn this information at the moment when we are about to play, which is much too late to be changing seating assignments. When there’s missing players the WCC opts to remove players from the highest numbered tables and send them to fill in places at lowered numbered tables.

If a tiered player is one of the ones missing there’s little we can do. It would be too cumbersome to identify another player in the field of a lower tier and move them up to a higher tier, and then replace their vacant spot in the tier they just left. Instead we accept this bit of randomness and players who would have played a tiered player who are now playing an unseeded player can be regarded as slightly fortunate.

However we do make one change to prevent the possibility of a player for Tier 1 or 2 being displaced from their high numbered tabled and bumped down randomly to some lower table. Such a scenario would be unfortunate for their opposition who might now face multiple opponents in the 1st or 2nd Tiers in their preliminary round. The change we make is that if the size of the cycles are working out that a Tier 1 or 2 slot will be situated in the highest 3 numbered tables, we replace that position with a Tier 4 player. Then if that Tier 4 player is sent to a lower numbered table, the change to the opposition strength of the players they will face isn’t greatly impacted.

How Tiers are Assigned

How the Tiers are assigned is a topic that is re-analyzed each year, and has not been set yet for 2026. The World Championship prefers to place a good deal of weight on results for its own event in the last two years, and generally prefers to consider one elite performance at one event in the past year higher than consistent strong results throughout the year.

In 2025 the WCC ranked players for singles as follows:

Top 4 from 2024 WCC
NCA Tier 1 singles winners in past 12 months
NCA Tier 1 singles 2nd place finishers in past 12 months
Top 10 finishers at NCA Tour
5th-10th at 2024 WCC
NCA Tier 1 singles 3rd and 4th place finishers in past 12 months
Top 10 finishers at 2023 WCC
NCA Tier 2 singles winners in past 12 months
. . .

And the ranking went on further and further, along with a couple of wildcard positions given to known international attendees of stature.

While people could reasonably argue that certain criteria should be considered more or less impressive, the main objective of the WCC approach is to eliminate the possibility of a particularly unfavourable arrangement of opponents being assigned, and this accomplishes that well.

More Tournaments, More 20s, More than a Year in Review of Crokinole

May 12, 2025

"Your so-called boss may own the clock that taunts you from the wall, but, my friends the hour is yours."

Yes, my friends, not only is the hour yours, so is this 2024 (plus a bit) crokinole year in review blog.

Like any quote torn from its context it’s quite flexible in the meaning one can draw from it. Its application to a desired justification is as malleable as double-bubble gum. And its meaning, at this moment, is to inspire a look back at 2024.

Now you are probably thinking, "shouldn’t this have been posted months ago?" My answer to you: I am, bravely of course, unencumbered by the passage of time. I am pushing the boundaries of not only calendar recognition, but also the norms of timing year in review analysis. Why should I let a simple thing like the adoption of the Gregorian calendar a mere not even 500 years ago, or the orbiting of the earth stop me from executing a good idea I had months ago?

Shouldn’t this have been posted before the end of 2024? Shouldn’t this have been posted before tournaments were played in 2025?

My answer: the blog gets written when the little spirit of crokinole penmanship crawls into my fingers to express its will. Should that not happen until a month(s) later, it is only greater evidence that I am an innovator.

And really, who’s to lose from a year in review blog written four months late? When I picked up Easter chocolate a week late it was 50% off and just as delicious! So too will be this blog.

The above quote, for those curious, is from a book in the thriller science-fiction television show Severance. If it wasn’t such a captivating show, then maybe I would have written this earlier. And with that extended prelude, on with the review.

International

The international crokinole scene was a lot harder to follow this year; that’s a good thing. I remember when knowing the results of one tournament would pretty much sum it all up. Even keeping up with the NCA is tough to do, which is where we’ll start.

The NCA’s announcement of a new tournament tiering structure has allowed the Tour to explode in events. Most of those new ones are coming from the USA with events in Texas, Missouri, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Florida, New York, California, and the Carolinas. The new tour stops have caused the stock to rise of a few Americans who have been frequenting the events.

To name only a few, Ryan Buhr, Jamie Harter, Darin Van Gammeren and Brian Ruckdeschel have been previously unknown or lesser known and racked up some high finishes.

Also of note in the new events that popped up was the appearance of Antonio Cuaresma in the Brooklyn Doubles Championship. Cuaresma has been promoting crokinole in Spain for a few years and attended the 2022 UK Championships and the 2023 World Championships previously. His journey to Brooklyn was his most successful crokinole trip, winning the title with partner Jose Gonzalez.

Exciting news out of USA in the past year and a bit as well is the emergence of two new crokinole tours, the Northeast Crokinole Tour and the Southeast Crokinole Circuit. It will be exciting to see which competitors rise to the top in those respective tours during their first season.

In Hungary there’s a couple new competitors who have found their way to the top. There are still names we’ll remember like Krisztián Berzlánovich, Árpád Lonsták and Péter Ladányi. But taking the two big Hungarian tournaments in 2024 was a new name, Ádám Huszárik. He won both the World Cup and Hungarian Championships, defeating Berzlánovich in the final, while another new name Nikolett Huszárik finished in the top four in both events.

At the World Cup the reigning Dutch Champions, Joert Edink and Sander Brugman took the doubles title. They’ve been on a roll after coming away from 2024 with the Belgian Championship for the first time. And the duo that’s dubbed themselves the Roaring Twenties will be in competition at the 2025 World Championships.

Crokinole UK completed its first season in 2024, and is now well nearing the completion of its second season and it continues to be a great success. Events in the UK first were a neat spectacle to see Brian Cook back in competitive action and a winner of the first two editions of the UK Championships in 2022 and 2023. He hasn’t been as active since the Tour began, but the level of competition has certainly risen to give Cook a tough time when he is competing.

Tom Curry won 4 events on the 2023-2024 Tour to win the Tour title, including winning the 2024 UK Championships. This season his success has continued, winning 3 events (out of the 5 total events so far). Steve Burrows has played in 2 events and won them both, and is the only one who can catch Curry in the season standings this year. Mike Ray currently sits in a solid position to finish among the top 3 on the Tour.

Not included in the UK Tour standings, but still an event of prestige is the UK Doubles Championship which was won by the Hungarian team of Árpád Lonsták and Nikolett Huszárik.

There’s only one event left in the 2024-2025 Tour and it will be the 2025 UK Championships happening just one week before the World Championships.

In case you missed it

Outside of the pure realm of competition there was a lot of interesting crokinole stuff happening throughout 2024.

A tremendous analysis and description of crokinole was written by Russell Samora of The Pudding. It easily earns the title of best crokinole explainer of the year.

The best data visualization of the year has to go to Shawn Hagarty. He has created his own computer program that allows him to track shot-by-shot crokinole statistics and has published them all on his tableau page. As I have nibbled around such a project for the last five years and not produced anything tangible, I feel confident in expressing that Hagarty’s work is tremendous.

Years ago Ron Langill took a vacation to Cuba and came back with a fantastic story about coming upon a crokinole club there. The story was so fantastic eventually people realized it might have been written more for humour than to describe a factual event. Langill was seemingly inspired from a trip to the Dominican Republic, because soon after another similar sounding story was regaled. Lately Langill has been recapping historic events in crokinole that have involved The Hollies, strongman Louis Cyr, a Babe Ruth imitator, and most recently a crokinole board placed under the curling ice at the 2006 Olympics.

There’s a quote I love from a 1915 novel by George Fitch that reads, ”When crokinole was introduced to Homeburg, some twenty odd years ago, the kerosene wagon had to make an extra mid-week trip.” I love how illustrative that quote is of the time when crokinole was a new game that caused tremendous excitement. It’s hard to believe there was a time before household electricity when people didn’t really have a good reason to stay up past the setting of the sun. That was until crokinole came along, and all of the sudden everyone’s lighting expenses doubled.

Today people still describe crokinole as a great game you can play when the power is out. That was tested at the Ontario Doubles Crokinole Championship this year when the municipal hydro operations had the power cut to the church for about the first 30 minutes of the planned tournament schedule. Tournament organizers decided to wait for the lights to come back on.

The Brucefield church filled with crokinole boards and no lights. — Power Out in Brucefield

In the media world, 20 years after first doing a short segment about the World Crokinole Championship (one which got me into the competitive scene), TVO returned to do another short segment on the event. And in the podcasting world a duo in the UK has created the Hogan’s Alley podcast to give crokinole fans two podcasts to listen to as Andrew Hutchinson’s Pink Shirt podcast continues in its third season.

Simon Dowrick created a tremendously exciting new tournament called The Crokinole Cup. The event modelled itself after the football (aka soccer) World Cup, with players arranging matches against each other over the course of a few weeks, culminating in knock-out matches for the title. It was one of a kind and was capped off with a really exciting final match which I won’t spoil if you have a free hour. Other matches from the event can be viewed on the Crokinole Cup YouTube channel.

In YouTube/video space 2024 was the first year that I, CrokinoleCentre, had pulled back on my media obligations. I note that in my absence crokinole’s popularity has only went up. Coincidence?

But to my great pleasure competitive crokinole is still being broadcast thanks to the efforts of TraceyBoards and Garret Tracey, who have picked up the baton and jumped on a jet pack. Consistently Garret is putting out more videos in a more timely fashion then I ever did, which is no easy feat, and is helping to continue to document the story of competitive crokinole.

Speaking of the story of competitive crokinole: what an amazing year it was for excitement!

Narrow Margins, Similar Results

The quick, too-long-didn’t-read, recap of the 2024 crokinole year is that the same people won, despite the margins being so close.

At the World Championships, Justin and Fred Slater defended their 2023 world championship title with another win. The 2024 margin of victory was a single point over two different teams (Reinman/Conrad, Hutchinson/Tracey). It was their 5th world title, and the third time their world title was won by just one point.

On the singles side, Connor Reinman also defended his 2023 world title, winning 6-2, 5-3 against Josh Carrafiello in the final. It’s worth pointing out the Reinman and the Slaters won not only the 2023 and 2024 world championships, but also 2022 NCA Players Championship, which I had hoped would be viewed on the same level as the worlds, but I don’t think it quite got there. Still though, in a different world these individuals could possibly be three-time defending world champions.

In other doubles events we saw Jason and Ray Beierling win in Owen Sound, then Josh Carrafiello and Ron Langill win the Ontario Championships, and Andrew Hutchinson and Jeremy Tracey win the US Open. The parity of results certainly adds a lot of intrigue into the upcoming World Championships.

The Emergence of Crokinole’s Big 4

If I had gotten around to writing this at the close of 2024 I would have had much more confidence in this segment. Throughout 2024 we saw a phenomenon emerge that was extremely exciting from a spectator point of view. This was the combined dominance and competitiveness of four players in the singles game: Justin Slater, Connor Reinman, Andrew Hutchinson and Josh Carrafiello.

Throughout 2024 here’s how they finished in singles events featuring more than one of them:

Elmira - 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 7th
Chatham - 1st, 2nd
London - 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 6th
Ontario Singles - 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th
World - 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th
Turtle Island - 1st, 2nd, 4th
Belleville - 1st, 3rd, 13th

That’s only one event where they collectively didn’t cover the top two spots, and only three of the events did any of them finish outside the top 4. Into 2025 their collective performance hasn’t been as dominant, but it is still very impressive:

Elmira - 1st, 3rd, 4th, 11th
Windsor - 1st, 2nd
Crokinole Cup - 1st, 3rd
London - 2nd, 3rd, 5th
Ontario Singles - 1st, 3rd, 5th

Now why is this so much fun? I find there’s something about the entertainment of individual sports that is lacking when there is either too few players who are dominant, or when too many players are viewed with a realistic shot to win.

Not so much anymore, but I used to watch a lot of tennis. There was a two year stretch in the early 2000s when 8 different players won the 8 grand slams that took place on the men’s side. It was pretty hard to build up much excitement when there were more people who had a chance to win then I could keep together in my head. And later on there was a stretch in the mid 2000s (Federer) and in the mid 2010s (Djokovic) when the game was dominated pretty much by one player, to the point that every opponent felt like a massive underdog.

Now some like the randomness of sports, and the feeling like anyone can win. And some will say they like the predictability and the feeling that they are watching greatness before them: like Usain Bolt or Michael Jordan. But neither of those are for me. On one hand the outcome feels as interesting as a coin toss, and on the other the outcome can feel pre-determined.

There was a sweet spot in the middle though where men’s tennis was extremely fun to watch, and the game had four household names: Federer, Nadal, Djokovic, Murray. You could count on them to make the semifinals, and you could count on them to have spectacular matches against each other.

That’s where we were with Slater, Reinman, Hutchinson and Carrafiello. You could count on them to make it into the late stages of tournaments, and they frequently produced great crokinole matches.

And from a spectator standpoint it creates a lot of fun having a big 4 dynamic. You can craft story lines in your mind about their respective rivalries, and pick and re-pick favourites depending on the moment. It’s easy to sell the story to prospective fans:

Slater is the established king of crokinole, with everyone gunning for his crown.
Reinman is the clutch contender who is theoretically on level ground with the rest, but has managed to come out win the win in big events.
Hutchinson is the hard-luck player. Long ago he racked up 5th place finishes, then he got over that hump only to encounter a brutal series of losses to Reinman at every turn, and now having gotten that monkey off his back, he wants to win every event.
Carrafiello is the outsider, still not even two full years removed from his cues to fingers switch, and already knocking on the door of the players with much more fingers experience that he.

See? You can tell I’m having fun.

And in 2024 it was the first time I can recall having a big 4 in crokinole.

Before the NCA there was Brian Cook and Ray Beierling a clear step ahead of the competition. They were eventually joined by Justin Slater and Jon Conrad, and they did sweep the top 4 at the 2012 Worlds and 2013 Turtle Island. But the combination of those four never did get a good chance to establish itself with Slater out of province most of the year, and Cook later moving out of country.

After that there was never quite the same dominance and competition at the top. Justin Slater did most of the winning in the years that followed, with Ray Beierling also racking up quite a few, with interruptions from Conrad, Nathan Walsh and Jason Beierling.

Note that I said I would have felt more confident in this Big 4 declaration at the end of 2024, because two other names are popping onto the same stage of the established four. Those are Jason Beierling, who won in London and finished second in Elmira, and Devon Fortino, who finished second in Belleville and Ontario.

Should we start to call it a Big 6? I don’t think the delineation is as strong yet. In the CrokinoleCentre ELO rankings the Slater/Reinman/Hutchinson/Carrafiello quartet continue to have a sizeable gap on the rest of the competition, but Beierling and Fortino are getting closer to joining them.

The 20s

If you missed it, in September I wrote a recap of the Belleville event, where the old 20s world record was beaten. Additionally, a record for the highest average 20s score across a group was shattered (previously set at 116, now reset to 133), while 7 players registered a 20s inside the top 13 all-time performances.

The Belleville tournament was an anomaly. Or at least it seemed like one until we got into these 2025 tournaments. In the 2025 Elmira event in January, 3 more players registered 20s scores inside the top 10 all-time. Then at the 2025 Ontario Singles Championship, 3 more players not only set 20s scores inside of the top 10, they all beat the previous world record.

Brian Cook held the world record with an average of 153.3 20s over 10 games at the 2011 Hamilton event. Justin Slater took the record with an average of 164.5 at the 2019 Hamilton event, and then reset it in Belleville at 165.6.

At the Ontario Singles Championship Shawn Hagarty recorded 168.9, and that was only good enough for 3rd on the day.

The new world record is now jointly shared between Josh Carrafiello and Andrew Hutchinson, both who averaged 181.1 over 10 games. The full list can be viewed here. It’s probably not a surprise that the highest average 20s score across a group was also set, with the 10 players in their group averaging 142.2 20s.

There sure are a lot more 20s than there used to be. The Ontario Singles Crokinole Championship was the last event that had a 20s record older than 5 years, previously held by Nathan Walsh with 138 in 2013 (there were nine 20s scores higher than that this year). And now there’s only one tournament left with a 20s record that’s more than two years old, which is the Turtle Island event where Connor Reinman holds the record due to a score in 2019.

What could possibly explain this recent sudden deluge of 20s scoring?

Boards? Discs? Wax? Players?

I’ll leave aside the discussion on what amount of 20s scoring is too much for crokinole, and what could be done if that was the case for another day. For now, I’ll just say, that’s a lot of friggin 20s!

World Crokinole Championships

Just a few words on this because I promised I’d help preview the tournament on an upcoming podcast instead.

I’m really excited for this event. The competitiveness in Doubles competitions in the last year puts a few teams into the mix, and for the first time this year there will be a championship match to determine the World Champion.

And in the singles, the favourites would be among the six names I’ve mentioned above, but many other names have had those flashes of brilliance this year that suggest their skill is good enough to win should it all come together on the day. Additionally, there are a number of international players signed up for this year’s event that could be competitive as well, which always spices things up!

I think it’s likely in the upcoming World Crokinole Championship prognostications that you’ll hear a general consensus that it’s getting harder and harder to win the WCC every year, and that there’s more strong players in crokinole than there ever was before.

I think the first part is true, but the second part is not.

From 2004-2011 Brian Cook made the World Championship final every year. It feels extremely unlikely this feat will be repeated or neared in the coming years. There was a span of 6 tournaments in a row that Justin Slater won between 2015-2016, that too feels extremely difficult to do today.

There’s generally just too many strong players willing to attend most of the crokinole tournaments available on the calendar. But I don’t think that necessarily means there’s more strong players than there used to be.

This will sound unusual to some, but in the past there used to be lots of great crokinole players who would not attend crokinole tournaments. I recall facing some of these players from the Preston, St. Jacobs and Cameron Heights crokinole clubs that I’d never seen before at the Schneider Haus event. They would be very strong players, all capable of finishing in the top 10 at the World Championships, and maybe even making the final and winning it. But they didn’t come to the WCC because they believed Joe Fulop or Brian Cook was better than them, and that they couldn’t win.

I’m not going to pretend to know their motives, but just to pick a couple examples, former World Champions Derek Kidnie, Al Fuhr and Bruce Hartung didn’t attend the World Championships at all in the 2010s. Surely their skill, even if diminished from their peak, was still strong enough for a decent showing.

I’d say it’s harder to win the WCC, undoubtedly, because pretty much all of the top contenders are showing up these years. And it makes for great excitement.

But crokinole has been around for a long time, and it stands to reason there was a lot of great players in the past as well.

Remembering Some Crokinole Related Twitter Moments

November 10, 2024

I used to check twitter at least weekly for some sort of crokinole content and engage with it in some way in an effort to building some more online activity. I did this for probably a decade, and like my recession from crokinole videos, I eventually came to stop. When reports came out months ago that twitter was removing old content I went spelunking trying to remember some of the humourous moments in the past.

Being at the ripe age to have been at the right age for social media’s introduction into everyday human life I observed with twitter the same life cycle you can find on any other platform that had its day in the sun. In the era before the social media platform gets algorithmically spliced into fragments that turns its user-experience into a jaded daily high school-reunion for anyone who doesn’t have anything better to do, there is a period where the platform is fun to be on. For a time the platform can be unpredictable in a good-natured way that encourages a sense of adventure and discovery.

Looking for crokinole occurrences on twitter back in the good days was like looking for bald eagles in Ontario today; quite rare, but usually amazing when it was spotted. I had a pretty fun time looking back through a treasure trove of unusual spottings, so now I shall share this pleasure with anyone still perusing this particular platform that is well past its best days.

In case these posts do disappear, I provide a link and a screenshot to everything below.

PEI Politics

Not just twitter, but I also used to scavenge all depths of the internet for crokinole, and in 2011 found an article from the University of PEI student newspaper where the school President battled a student in a game of crokinole. Years later I’d see a familiar face flash across my TV as the former UPEI President had been elected Premier of PEI. From then on I knew the Premier, Wade MacLauchlan, was a crokinole player. So I wasn’t surprised when in 2016 a reporter tweeted this:

Kerry Campbell - The Premier just recognized provincial crokinole champions in the legislature. — Twitter

That tweet was followed up days later with a CBC article comically declaring "Premier Wade MacLauchlan rattled in crokinole game". The Premier showcased classic crokinole sportsmanship when he declared, "There’s always tomorrow."

Another prominent politician, Nate Erskine-Smith, has a strong connection to crokinole. He even has, or had depending on when you read this, a custom 20s board for his Ottawa office. Sadly he was unsuccessful in his bid to become Ontario Liberal leader, so we miss out on having a second premier in Canada starting to play competitively.

Erskine-Smith shows off his 20s crokinole board. — Twitter

Some Good Memes

Who doesn’t love a good meme? Well me, usually. They can get old quick. But if you just look at them for a few seconds before scrolling to something else, the way God intended, they can be pretty funny.

And of course I’d be remiss if I didn’t bring up the twitter account dedicated to crokinole memes, aptly called @crokinolememes.

And here is an appreciation post for the person who may or may not be behind the account.

Did this really happen?

When twitter started it was a great place to brag to strangers about stuff that happened in your life. Eventually, given the lack of accountability that prevails on the internet, people realized they could start bragging about things that didn’t happen. These next two might have happened, but I can’t say for sure.

I used to correspond with someone who worked at Dreamworks and ran an office crokinole league. Always wondered what happened to it.

In 2014 there was a flurry of tweets written in Japanese about crokinole. Trying to find them after the fact has been nearly impossible, but one person did reference the episode years later.

The full story is a film about the life of Japanese Emperor Hirohito was released, in which an off-hand remark was made about an unknown game he played in his childhood. Interested people took to the internet to try to discover the identity of the game, and found it to be crokinole.

Whenever I’m in an ice-breaking activity there’s two fun facts about myself that I trot out. The first is the obvious one, that I play crokinole competitively and even have a world championship title to my name. The second is that as a child I used to know Justin Bieber. Which is why I called into question the veracity of this story.

Now I didn’t go to the same elementary school as Bieber, but I rode the country bus with quite a few who did, and who all knew that I played crokinole in those days. And I just feel like during one of those hour-long bus rides home they would have mentioned that their school had an active crokinole scene. And if they did tell me that 20 years ago there’s absolutely no way I would have forgotten because I would have transferred to that school immediately. Case closed.

What were they thinking when they took this photo?

Growing up with the internet it was always good advice to ask yourself what your grandmother would think if she saw what you were posting online. It turns out questioning the motives of some other generation works with both predecessors and ancestors. You look at the photos below and you just wonder what was going through their mind when they took it?

In all fairness I know what they were thinking in this one. The photographer had to tell them to move their chairs to get an open shot of the board. Little did they know they’d give Jon Conrad a new chair placement strategy to adopt.

And this isn’t a photo but it’s a darn good comic.

Patrick Callaghan - Owen Sound Times (2014)

TV References

You have to wonder what it’s like working in Hollywood in the set department, trying to dress up some scene with props that tell the story of what a character is like. Do these people even know what crokinole is when they slap a board into the background?

Not specifically a TV thing, but this was how I found out someone wrote the game crokinole into an official Star Wars extended universe piece of entertainment.

Also not TV, but someone went to the effort of making fanart for the game Overwatch, and put crokinole into it.

Yet another celebrity look-a-like in the world of crokinole.

Mennonite Humour

Just as people would be surprised by how much crokinole content exists on the internet, I was constantly surprised by how much mennonite-based humour exists.

The Freundschaft Photo account was one of my favourites.

I like this one for the fact that it is annoying The Crokinole Movie isn’t on Netflix.

And I always love a reference to Punkeydoodles Corners.

There also used to be a bunch of tweets from another Mennonite humour account called The Daily Bonnet. The account has since been removed and rolled under an account called The Unger Review but all of the satire news stories about crokinole can be found here. Some of the best jokes are just in the titles, like "New Regulations Force Female Crokinole Players to Wear Short Skirts" and "LeBron James Quits Basketball to Take on New Challenge: Crokinole".

Fan Appreciation

On twitter it was really common to see people have a passing interest in the game. Usually the least expected posts were when some stranger actually expressed genuine interest in a deep knowledge of the competitive scene.

Garret Tracey introduced me as "the man, the myth, the legend behind CrokinoleCentre" on a video recently, but I think I prefer being known as the Spanish version of "Idol and reference of the crokinole." ¿Estas conmigo?

This guy is such a big fan of Jason Beierling he’s declaring his two finals appearances in Hamilton as good enough to be proclaimed as "damn near every year."

If you are dog-lover you should click through the link to see the short video in this tweet.

Okay, and now one earnest compliment.

Okay, two.

Miscellaneous

My big hope with crokinole on twitter is that some famous people would tweet about it and spark some interest. The closest we got to that was SungWon Cho who is a pretty famous YouTuber and actor (he was in the Blackberry movie).

An astute observation from Zeus.

A $100 idea.

You’ve heard of some people being clue-less about crokinole, how about someone being cue-less.

And if you are a curling fan, take the 38 seconds to watch this clip of a professional curler experimenting with the concept of drag effect in crokinole.

Life without hockey.

Ok I’m going to be pedantic here. This is not an edge case from a crokinole rules perspective.

Never knew this about Brian Cook.

I know the feeling.

And I don’t what to say about this, but it looks cool.

Crokinole where?

One of the joys of constantly surveying twitter for crokinole mentions was being quick to learn of events and clubs happening in places where organized crokinole was unknown,

A prime example was finding out about the club in Japan that brought us Ryotaro Fukuda.

I don’t know anything about this tournament that happened in Manitoba, but the organizer sure has the gist of how it works.

Back in 2015 a pub in Toronto pioneered the act of playing crokinole with alcohol in the vicinity.

Sault Ste Marie draws a big crowd for championship matches.

Before they scored a top 4 finish at the Worlds, we knew there was a group of players from Harvard thanks to their lab sending out practice updates on a regular basis.

Honestly, I respect this attitude following an Alberta tournament.

Tom Thomson

In addition to looking for crokinole content, I also liked to use twitter to briefly experience Canadian art. It is not rare on twitter to have accounts specializing in fandom of particular actors, singers or athletes. It should not be considered too strange that for years someone has been operating an account to showcase the works of Canada’s most famous painter, Tom Thomson.

What was a little strange was when the twitter account pretended to be Thomson living his final days in Algonquin Park before his tragic death. Rather than painting, he was apparently playing a lot of crokinole.

That being said if he was playing a lot of crokinole that could bring new meaning to the Tragically Hip lyrics about Thomson, "He said, "bring on the brand new renaissance / 'Cause I think I'm ready / When I was shaking all night long / But my hands were steady." We all wish our hands were steady on the crokinole board.

Centre Wellington District High School

Now here’s a school I wish I went to.

Gaming Conventions

Twitter was also a fun place to check in on major events that you weren’t attending. It sure made it seem like a great time.

Crokinole Manga

One frequently astonishing occurrence on twitter was to see comic strips detailing an action-based story of crokinole with Japanese dialogue.

I was left who was making these and what the story was about. I’m still wondering, but the full collection of the work can be found here for those interested.

Hutchinson

Always good for a laugh or to tie in some other sport into the crokinole world was Andrew Hutchinson before he quit social media.

Zone of Vanity

Back in the day I definitely held the title for most crokinole tweets, so I’m going to take a victory lap to admire some of my best posts.

Twitter in celebration of this article about the 2019 World Cup written in Hungarian

The origin of twitter limited posts to 140 characters. This legend only needed 10 to show us the way.

Newcomer Shakes-Up Scene, 20s Rain Biblically, in Bonkers Belleville Challenge

September 21, 2024

Unmerited and Self-Indulgent Prelude

When I started to write this blog 12 years ago I made a resolute but unconscious decision to either exclude any first-person identifiers (I, me, my) from the entirety of a piece, or to make it clear to the reader I was putting myself front and centre into the argument presented. This was a behaviour, along with many others, I mimicked from the political journalists and sports reporters I enjoyed reading, each of whom share the same respect for the mutually exclusive worlds of stories in which their presence is either relied upon heavily, or completely unnecessary.

With good reason, there’s a compulsion to put that aside today.

Some time ago these blogs of tournament recaps, the meat and potatoes of this CrokinoleCentre website, began to feel formulaic and repetitive. Faced with that realization, I felt like there wasn’t much to write about anymore. The words from Ecclesiastes, the most emo book in the bible, rang out in my head “There is nothing new under the sun.”

This will sound jaded, but in crokinole I thought I could no longer be surprised.

After having spent most of the day repeatedly dropping and picking my jaw off the floor of Quinte’s Sports and Wellness Centre, and then searching for my socks on the side of Cannifton Road after they were blown off, I knew I’d have to come out of my exaggerated and self-imposed retirement to write an emergency blog. And fortunately for the reader, after having stared at break-lights on the Toronto section of the 401, I’ve had time to compose my thoughts into something lucid.

The Stuff You Actually Care About

The 2024 Belleville Crokinole Challenge brought in a tournament-record 48 contenders, and that was far from the only record that fall on the day.

Justin Slater was seated into Group 1 in the morning and racked up 66 points in 9 games (pro-rates to 73.3 points over 10 games), setting the record for most points ever scored in the Belleville round robin, and good enough for 7th all-time in NCA singles events. Four more players, Andrew Hutchinson, Ron Langill, Ray Beierling and Shawn Hagarty, followed with point scores that prior to the day would have all been within the top 10 round robin scores ever recorded in Belleville.

But beyond the impressiveness of the points scoring was the 20s total of Justin Slater. He scored 149 20s in 9 games, which sets a new world record. The previous world record, set by Slater in Hamilton in 2019, averaged out to 148.1 20s in 9 games, so like Mondo Duplantis setting new pole vault world records, Slater has set a new record by a single 20 shot.

Also worth pondering was that the 20s mark from Slater came in the preliminary round, as most 20s world record close encounters happen in secondary rounds. There many top players are clustered together, boosting each others scores through the repartee in which 20s scored by one player typically only provide an additional opportunity for a 20 for the opposition. Amazingly, Slater achieved this 20s feat without the assistance of top competition.

Momentarily lost in the excitement of the 20s score was the excitement to follow about who actually advanced into what pool for the afternoon in Belleville. Scanning the names of the A pool advancers revealed the elite contender of Josh Carrafiello had missed the cutoff by a margin of less than 1 point, after pro-rating for a different number of games played in each group. Advancing at his expense was the unknown name of Devon Fortino of North Bay; “he’s a pretty good shooter,” was all that was whispered about as players began to settle in for the afternoon. What an understatement.

The afternoon kicked off and I was predicting another 20s record would be broken. Slater was sitting in the same row as the morning, ready to utilize his familiarity with the boards, while the rest of the 20s high-rollers were coming in looking for improvements against the stronger competition. The result would be a unprecedented surplus of 20s across the group.

After 10 games, this was the standings in Group A ordered by 20s only:

Devon Fortino - 158
Justin Slater - 152
Andrew Hutchinson - 151
Jason Beierling - 150
Shawn Hagarty - 148
Ron Langill - 130
Ryan Buhr -125
Ray Beierling - 120
Nathan Walsh - 118
Fred Slater - 117
Garret Tracey - 97

While no one would surpass Slater’s morning record, 5 players from the A group had scores that before today would have been in the top 10 all-time 20s rankings, and Josh Carrafiello would have made it a 6th with 147 20s scored in the B group.

Looking purely at the history of the Belleville tournament, nearly the entire top 10 list of 20s performances was replaced in a single day. Darren Carr’s 137 20s from the B group adds in to knock Jason Beierling’s prior tournament-record of a 131.1 average in 10 games from the 2018 tournament down to 9th.

The players across Group A scored an average of 133 20s, which is by far the largest ever average 20s scored in a single round robin. The previous high marks was 116 scored in the 2018 Hamilton, 115 in 2019 Owen Sound, and 113 and 112 scored in the individual Round of 16 groups at the 2024 WCC.

Some theories were bandied about to try to explain the surge in 20s. None were convincing to my liking.

Some pointed to the level of competition, which was high, but arguably not as high as other tournaments one can find on the NCA Tour. Some pointed to boards, but this wasn’t like the good-old days of the Hamilton tournament where boards year-after-year delivered high 20s. The boards were similar to any other Belleville event, which historically hasn’t delivered a specially high number of 20s scored. Don’t even think about mentioning discs, which were certainly not new, in fact they were quite well-used.

Honestly the only thing of note that was new or different about this 2024 Belleville tournament was a commercial-sized fan that looks like it was pulled out of a chicken barn that now looks over the playing area. Somehow I doubt that was the difference.

As much as this achievement is exciting to me, I feel twinged with a vague despair. If the conditions in Belleville, whatever they were, can be repeated then I wonder if we are entering the world of too many 20s. From 2008-2009 there were 130 swimming world records broken, thanks in large part of polyurethane-based swimwear. The organizing body stepped in to ban them. I feel like a caveman who learned how to make fire one minute, and who accidentally burned down a tree the next. Ray Beierling was only half-joking when he lamented that he only had 3 perfect rounds in the afternoon!

Am I being too melodramatic? At this point you’d have to say yes, but it’s something to contemplate the next time you are dragged into a long 20 race against a rival foe.

The Bigger Surprise of the Day

20s excitement wasn’t all there was in Belleville, as the emergence of Devon Fortino continued unabated. While tournament favourites, Slater and Hutchinson, took the top 2 spots comfortably into the playoffs, Fortino solidified the greatest-ever NCA debut performance with a playoff appearance in 3rd place. He was followed 1 point behind by Jason Beierling for the 4th and final spot, who himself was followed 1 point behind by Nathan Walsh (oh yeah, that’s me).

The murmurs about just how good Fortino was continued as the players settled down for the semifinals. What was there to say? With the 20s parade that had happened throughout the day all that could be said confidently was that he was good at open 20s. He apparently only learned of the existence of competitive crokinole a few months prior to the Belleville event, but he looked like a seasoned pro.

Hutchinson would play Fortino in the semifinal which was a thrilling race-to-9 contest that never saw either player lead by more than 2 points, and featured 3 tied rounds, and eventually ended in a 9-7 victory for Fortino to continue his magical debut run. With the win Fortino became the only player outside of Josh Carrafiello, Justin Slater or Connor Reinman to defeat Hutchinson in an elimination match since crokinole’s return from covid.

In the other semifinal Jason Beierling was the on verge of defeating Justin Slater for the first time in a singles elimination match, before Slater had a miracle escape to come back from 8-4 down to win 10-8.

That setup the final of unheralded, but seemingly invincible, Devon Fortino, against the stalwart, record-setting machine of Justin Slater. A win for Fortino and a statue commemorating the occasion would have to be built outside the Belleville arena, TV news outlets would be forking over big bucks to Garret Tracey to get the video footage, and the crokinole world would have been set into a mayhem no lesser than if the Eagan-Fitzgerald crokinole cabal was actually real.

As I have chronicled the competitive crokinole milieu for a long time, and tried in vain to make mountains out of nuance molehills to make the game intriguing, I need to take a moment to underline just how shocking it was to have this newcomer-performance and 20s-domination on a single day. This wasn’t a case of looking up into the nighttime sky and being wowed by the beauty of a full moon. This was like looking up into the sky and seeing a meteor, 3 moons, and a cow orbiting the earth with the grace of Santa’s reindeer.

For a long time I’ve thought that a player needed to accumulate some competitive experience before they could truly compete with the best in the game. Fortino proved so solidly this was not the case that it makes me question my fundament understanding of competitive crokinole. The only other comparable performance I can think of is before my time in the game, when Bruce Hartung won the World Championship at his first ever event in 2005. “No one’s going to believe me when I get home,” he said. I always wondered what it was like to see a new guy show up and be that good. Now I know. It feels good to be surprised again.

In the end though, Slater was not to be denied with an 11-3 victory, which continued his perfect streak in Belleville of winning all 6 times he has entered the event. Perhaps, once again, there is nothing new under the sun.

World Crokinole Seeking Player Input on Format Changes for Singles Competition

December 25, 2023

The World Crokinole Championship (WCC) Committee has decided to revise the playoff format used at the WCC tournament, and has come up with two proposals for the singles competition. The WCC Committee is seeking player input to help make the decision on which of the two proposals should be implemented for the 2024 edition of the tournament.

The descriptions of the proposals are outlined below. Players wishing to share their opinions on the matter should do so by January 10th, by submitting an email to crokinolecentre@gmail.com.

Objective

The WCC Committee has embarked on this process to modify the tournament format after receiving noticeable competitor feedback of a desire to expand the playoff format to include more players. Of key consideration as well for the WCC is a strong desire to maintain the current tournament schedule, given that the tournament offers both doubles and singles competition and serves nearly 400 players.

Singles

The format for the competitive, cues, and recreational divisions in 2023 and in prior years was the following:

10-game preliminary round of random opponents
16 players advancing to playoffs, split into two pools to play 7-game round robin
4 players advancing (top two from each of the groups in the round of 16) to semifinal best-of-3 games head-to-head match
2 winners from previous round competing in a best-of-3 games head-to-head for 1st/2nd, and 2 losers competing for 3rd/4th

That format has been mostly unchanged since the first year of the tournament in 1999. The only change of note was in 2019 when the semifinal head-to-head matches were introduced, replacing the prior format where the final 4 consisted of a 3-game round robin.

Proposal #1

If the number of competitors is less than 50 then the format remains unchanged. If the category has more than 50 competitors, then the following format is used:

10-game preliminary round
- The top 10 players (1st-10th) advance directly into playoffs
- The next 24 players (11th-34th) enter a play-in round. The players are split into 6 pools of 4 players each, and play a 3-game round-robin. The 1st-place finisher in each of the 6 pools advances to the playoffs.
16 players advancing to playoffs, split into two pools to play 7-game round robin
4 players advancing (top two from each of the groups in the round of 16) to semifinal best-of-3 games head-to-head match
2 winners from previous round competing in a best-of-3 games head-to-head for 1st/2nd, and 2 losers competing for 3rd/4th

Here is the proposal described in a visual format:

Proposal #2

For the competitive division:

10-game preliminary round
- The top 16 players (1st-16th) advance into an Upper Bracket
- The next 32 players (17th-48th) advance into a Lower Bracket
All Upper Bracket games are head-to-head first-to-7 points matches, with the winner advancing to the next round, and the loser getting knocked down into the Lower Bracket.
- The player with 4 match wins in the upper bracket advances to the final
All Lower Bracket games are head-to-head first-to-5 points matches, with the winner advancing to the next round, and the loser eliminated from the tournament
The winner of the Lower Bracket meets the winner of the Upper Bracket in the championship match

For the cues and recreational divisions the same format is used, but with the top 8 players (1st-8th) advancing into an upper bracket, and the next 16 (9th-24th) advancing to a lower bracket.

Here is the proposal described in a visual format:

Doubles

Also worth mentioning is the WCC committee will implement a change to the doubles competitions. Currently the top 6 teams from the preliminary round advance to the playoffs, in which a 5-game round robin determines the champion.

The new doubles format will see the top 12 teams from the preliminary round advance to the Round of 12 playoffs. The 12 teams will be split into two pools of 6 teams each, where a 5-game round robin will be played. The top 2 teams from each pool will advance to the Final 4. In the final 4 the teams will play 2 games (crossing-over to play one game each against the teams from the other pool). The total points scored through all 7 playoff games (5 games in the Round of 12 plus 2 games in the Final 4) will determine the champion.

A Non-Definitive Review of Crokinole in 2023

December 19, 2023

2023 was crokinole’s first full year back from the covid-pause. I was thinking back on the year and being impressed by the breadth of it all. If you make a small-time hobby out of relaying crokinole stories, there was too much in the last 12 months to stay on top of it all. So in lieu of a professional job, here’s a non-definitive, non-comprehensive, (possibly non-good grammatical) recap of 2023.

There was lots of news regarding the National Crokinole Association early in the year. New tournaments started up in Elmira and Chatham, and the NCA went through a formalization process to enact a set of by-laws and elect an inaugural board of directors.

Elmira saw Ron Langill record his best-ever finish in a singles event, placing 2nd, but his break-through performance was overshadowed with a titanic clash in the other semifinal. Connor Reinman and Justin Slater squared off on the board, but also in the minds of all competitive crokinole players who were wondering which of the two was currently the best player in the game. Reinman won the semifinal match and the tournament, pushing such perceptions in his favour.

Ray Beierling re-emerged at the top of the crokinole game in Chatham, defeating Reinman in the final, and winning his first singles tournament since 2017. That championship match was out-done by the Match of the Year, a stupendous 3rd-place-match between Justin Slater and Jeremy Tracey. Even if you’ve already seen it, that match is well worth a rewatch. I’d recommend sliding it in between your family’s viewing of Charlie Brown’s Christmas Special and the 6-hour re-broadcast of the yule log fireplace.

Champions returned in the Spring-time with Justin Slater winning the NCA event in London. The win was his first singles victory, after 4 non-victorious finishes in prior tournaments, snapping his longest victory drought in over 10 years. A month later the Beierlings won the US Open in Voorheesville, defeating Jeremy and Reid Tracey in the championship match.

The Breakthrough Player of the Year honours is bestowed to Josh Carrafiello. One of the top players in the cues game, he started playing on the fingers side in 2020. Coming into 2023 his best ever finger-singles finish was a 15th, but he had an impressive showing in May, winning the prestigious Ontario Singles Championship after wins against Reinman in the semifinals, and Andrew Hutchinson in the finals. Carrafiello would not play on the fingers side at the World Championships, determined instead to win the cues division once before converting to fingers-play permanently. That goal was achieved in spades, as Carrafiello claimed the triple crown at the Worlds, winning the doubles, singles and 20s categories, including setting a cues 20s world record along the way.

While Connor Reinman was defeated in the Ontario semifinals, the performance was enough to cap off his marvellous 2022-2023 NCA season, culminating in his first ever NCA Tour Championship. He was joined on the NCA podium by Ray Beierling in 2nd, and Andrew Hutchinson in 3rd.

Leading into the World Crokinole Championships there was much excitement about the crokinole action happening around the world.

United Kingdom

A number of well-attended crokinole tournaments took place in the UK. A pretty exciting match took place between Tom Curry and Mike Ray early in the year at AireCon. Happening on the same day as the World Championships was the 2nd edition of the UK Crokinole Championship. The legendary Brian Cook won the first edition in 2022, and returned to retain the title in 2023; his stiffest competition on the day coming from Tom Curry in a slim 10-8 semifinal victory.

The playing hall at the 2023 UK Crokinole Championship. Photo credit: Daniel Sockett

Following these events was the establishment of the Crokinole UK Tour, which operates in similar fashion to the NCA Tour. The inaugural season is scheduled to have 6 events, concluding on June 1st, 2024 for the UK Crokinole Championship. Winners on the season so far include Árpád Lonsták (more on him in a bit), Tom Curry, Brian Cook and Mark Thurling. The battle for the Tour championship should be fun to watch.

You can follow the UK action via their news page, on their facebook page, or the hopefully to be burgeoning youtube channel.

Hungary

A new face has entered into the Hungarian crokinole circuit, named Árpád Lonsták. He’s had a very successful 2023, winning in Scotland in the first ever UK Tour event, and then winning on home soil in the last 3 events, which include the 28th and 29th editions of the MOM Kupa, and the 2023 Hungarian Crokinole Championships a couple weeks ago. Krisztián Berzlánovich still remains a top name in Hungary, having finished 2nd twice and 4th in those three tournaments.

The Hungarian Crokinole results can be best followed on the Europe Facebook group, and through the youtube channels run by Berzlánovich, and the new channel recently launched by Lonsták.

Spain, Belgium, Netherlands, Sweden

In Spain, crokinole has been getting a lot of attention with TV appearances in 2023. The first featuring Antonio Cuaresma, and the second on the subject of the 2023 Open de Catalunya. The marque events of the year seem to be the Spanish Open, the doubles and singles championship matches are available for viewing in their respective links.

The pair of Stef Schenkelaars and Sjoerd Diemel continued their crokinole promotion efforts with another edition of the Dutch Doubles Crokinole Championship in 2023 in Utrecht. Their annual crokinole tournament is one-of-a-kind and has the atmosphere of an English or Dutch darts tournament (with the crowd of spectators using the same types of chants). The 2023 national championship was won again by Sander Brugman and Joert Edink, and the final match can be viewed here.

3-time Dutch Champions - The Roaring Twenties. Photo credit: Joert Edink

The team of Brugman/Edink also compete at the Belgian national championships. For the third year in a row Brugman/Edink lost to the powerhouse Belgian pair of Bert Costermans and Dennis Vrints. Crokinole NL provided a short recap of the event. The 2022 championship match can be viewed here, and tournament information for 2024 can be found here. The full 2023 championship match can be viewed here, which features the round of the year in the 6th round when the players scored 19 consecutive open-20s.

And in Engholms, Sweden, Magnus Rundström has started up a club featuring crokinole action.

Australia

Some clubs have popped up in Australia in the last few years, and in 2023 was the 3rd edition of the Bottom Half of the World Cup.

Crokinole Bottom Half of the World Cup playing hall — Crokinole Bottom Half of the World Cup - Photo Credit: Gift Zeplin

The Footscray Flickers facebook is good to follow to get a flavour of what Australian crokinole is like. That club was responsible for presenting the game at the 2023 version of PAX Australia.

USA

There was lots of events of note in the USA. In Ohio Grant Flick and Travis Keener battled in the tournament final, with Flick coming away victorious. The Extra Pink Texas youtube channel has lots of videos one can watch of the action. That group is based in Houston, but there’s also a club in Dallas gaining momentum. A club in Toledo was also launched in the year and is producing enthusiasts and competitive players-alike. There’s also action in Alaska, where the Dry Bay club held the Alaska State Doubles Championship.

Japan

I can’t say that I know what the crokinole scene is like in Japan, but I can say this youtube channel posts crokinole videos from time-to-time, and they are always really pleasant and relaxing to watch.

Canada

Most of the Canadian news is covered in the rest of the report, but I’ll take this time to point out a couple other items. The first is a new club in Windsor. The second is that the current volunteers of the BC Provincial Championships are looking to hand-off the responsibility and accrued assets to an interested party. Running a tournament is a difficult task, but it is made much easier when there’s boards and a set of procedures readily available.

And lastly, in April of this year Joe Fulop passed away. I had the honour of writing the summary that appeared on the World Championship website regarding Fulop’s influence on crokinole. Crokinole has a long history, but much of it was never written down. When a few people started the effort of chronicling the game, Joe Fulop was the first star of crokinole, and will now always be regarded as one of the greats of the game.

The Tracey Road Trip

I’ll leave this section with just a couple sentences, because the Tracey Boards social media feeds do a better job of recapping this they I can. Tracey Boards went on an extensive tour of the USA in 2023, hitting up numerous gaming conventions and connecting with several newly formed clubs along the way. If you can’t find the social media feeds, here’s a few links to get you started.

Jeremy Tracey poses with crokinole board before Kansas sign on highway — Photo Credit: Tracey Boards

2023-2024 NCA Tour so far

In June Justin and Fred backed-up their 2022 NCA Players Championship with a doubles title as the World Crokinole Championships returned after a 3-year hiatus in 2023. Their title coming by a margin of two points ahead of Connor Reinman and Jeremy Tracey. In the mix as well in the doubles playoffs was the Hartung duo, including Bruce Hartung, the 2005 World Champ making a return to competitive crokinole after a decade absence. He would also be in the mix in the singles, making the top 16. But the headlines in singles are usually reserved for those making the top 4. Matt Brown had the surprise performance of the day, finishing first in his round of 16 group, and becoming the 19th player to make the WCC top 4 more than once. Justin Slater finished 3rd on the day, making the top 4 for the 8th time. Meanwhile, Andrew Hutchinson and Connor Reinman both qualified for the championship match for the first time, where Reinman won a tense and entertaining match to win the World title.

The performance of the year has to go to Reinman as well for his play during the Round of 16. He won all 7 games and along the way scored 2 perfect rounds. He scored 104 20s over 7 games (pro-rates to 148 over 10 games), which is the record 20s score at the World Championships, and good enough for 3rd all-time. He also scored 43 points, which is tied for the 3rd-most points scored in the round of 16 phase at the WCC, and he notched the largest ever margin between 1st and 2nd place finishers in round of 16 group, by finishing 11 points ahead 2nd place Hutchinson.

The NCA Tour returned to Tuscarora in August, and was joined by a visiting Brian Cook who placed 4th. Reinman came away with another victory, beating Ray Beierling in the finals, and narrowly defeating Hutchinson in the semis.

In Belleville, Justin Slater was in spectacular form and played flawlessly in the championship match against Hutchinson, after defeating Ron Langill in the semifinal.

The Owen Sound tournament’s competitive division featured team doubles for the first time. We saw rare Beierling/non-Beierling doubles team as Ray Beierling and Connor Reinman teamed up and went into the tournament as favourites along side the team of Jeremy Tracey/Andrew Hutchinson. However, both of those teams would be defeated in the semifinals. The team of Oliver and Philip Ware finished 30th at the World Championships, and put on a dazzling and surprising display to advance to the finals. They were defeated by the new formed team of Josh Carrafiello and Ron Langill, giving Carrafiello his second NCA title, and Langill his first.

That set the stage for the final event of 2023: the Ontario Doubles Championship. The tournament entry list was stacked with perennial contenders in the Beierlings and the Slaters, while Andrew Hutchinson/Jeremy Tracey, Nolan Tracey/Reid Tracey, and Carrafiello/Langill joined in as tournament favourites. Spicing up the field even more was Jon Conrad, playing in his 3rd event in 2023 after sitting out 2022, partnering with Reinman.

The tournament was defined by many close calls. In the morning action Tracey/Tracey advanced by a margin of 3 points ahead of Gloria Walsh/Nathan Walsh, while Conrad/Reinman advanced by virtue of a tiebreak ahead of Darlene Kuepfer/Jo-Ann Carter. Then in the cut-off for the quarterfinals, Conrad/Reinman again advanced through a tiebreak ahead of Peter Carter/Robert Bonnett. The drama continued in the playoffs where 6 of the 8 matches were decided 2 points, and other 2 matches only decided by 4 points. Darren Carr/Gina Schick, Jason Molloy/Seth Frank, Slater/Slater and Hutchinson/Tracey were eliminated in the quarterfinals. Conrad/Reinman made the finals after beating Tracey/Tracey, but lost to the Beierlings who beat Carrafiello/Langill in the other semifinal.

After such close doubles action, there’s a lot of storylines heading into the US Open and World Championship competitions in 2024.

Other stuff

Crokinole is about fun, and in case you forgot somewhere along in 2023, there was enough tomfoolery to remind you.

First Sander Brugman created a new nose-flicking technique.
Grant Flick made my nightmares come true by showing damage-related trick shot.
Michel Cloutier gave everyone some new baking ideas and Crokinole NL followed suit.
The Shelburne Curling Club got up to some shenanigans when the power went out
The US Open created a special award for the 5th place finishers of their event.

Regarding that last one, it’s apparently an American crokinole tradition to have a comical consolation prize. Gary Wasielewski found a historical record of Nebraska politicians playing crokinole, where "considerable amusement was created over the efforts of the gentlemen to avoid winning the consolation prize.”

It was a few years ago when Shut Up & Sit Down reviewed the game of crokinole, in a video that now has over a million views. They talked about crokinole again briefly in a recent video around here and it was pretty funny to hear carrom described as “not as round” as crokinole.

"Of the year" Honours

I’ve already given out a few "blank of the year" awards above, and at this point I should remind the reader this is a non-definitive honour bestowed with minimal research effort.

That being said I can confidently award the following:

Crokinole Physics Analysis of the year to Jeremy Bagai for being the only person in 150 years of crokinole history for actually studying how follow-through shots work. You might have to be slightly academically inclined to appreciate the work; which is thoroughly impressive.
While we are in the academic fields, the Crokinole History Research of the Year goes to Brian Cook for logging numerous instances of newspaper references to crokinole from 1880-1925.
Andrew Hutchinson launched the Pink Shirt Podcast in late 2022, and from it I’m selecting the podcast of the year as the episode he had with Connor Reinman reviewing the 2023 World Championships.

The hardest selection was that of shot of the year, but I’ve landed on Lizz Mackie-Donnelly’s shot during the US Open, which resulted in a double-takeout 20.

Lastly there is the honour of video of the year. In 2022 the Netherlands group came out with two videos which were pretty hilarious even if one had to use translated subtitles to figure out what was being said. The first was actually on the local news and discussed a doubles partnership that disbanded after one player’s crucial miss eliminated them the following year. The second video gave a dramatic recap of the 2022 event.

An honourary mention goes to video which wasn’t filmed in 2023, but I can’t believe no one made mention of it before I did. I would be a little surprised if famous TV personality Jon Stewart knows what crokinole is, but one of the guests on his show decided to coin a crokinole-related term in hilarious fashion.

“Holy crokinole” gets coined on American TV, during season 1 episode 7 of the The Problem with Jon Stewart

Warning: curse words pic.twitter.com/ZtHP3uRGfE
— CrokinoleCentre (@CrokinoleCentre) October 7, 2023

2023 Video of the Year goes to Calvert Hall College, a catholic prep school from Maryland. Watch and enjoy:

Recently WMAR joined us on campus to learn more about one of our newest clubs on campus - Crokinole! Watch this 90 second video to learn more about the game that has been around since 1876. pic.twitter.com/DMQfcOzJov
— Calvert Hall College (@calverthall) December 5, 2023

While I haven’t seen him take credit, I’m assuming the thanks for creating this club goes to Mr. Ufnar, and doesn’t this look like a good time everyone can get behind!

Some incredible quotes in this video.

"When we tell them 'Hey, it’s a board game.' They’re like 'uh, that’s boring!'" Yep, been there many times in my life.

"I come to crokinole because it’s fun, and I like trash talk." I'm sure this is what Jeremy Tracey was like in highschool.

"You realize it’s not just some stupid game, it’s really competitive." High praise indeed!

"It really does get pretty cut-throat, in this silly board game." And that’s how this game has been for 150 years.

Also seeing students in full suits play crokinole is pushing me even closer to following through on this idea.

Love photos like this! I’m very tempted to show up to a crokinole tournament in a full suit https://t.co/0hlrfCRm5X
— CrokinoleCentre (@CrokinoleCentre) April 6, 2023

Sudden Death vs Quinte Convention & An Analysis of Hammer Strength

September 11, 2023

The last shot in crokinole, aka the hammer, it’s an advantage right? Certainly! We all know that and it’s perhaps the first bit of strategy any competitive player knows; if it’s all tied up and you’ve got the hammer, you are probably in a position to win.

But how important is it to have the hammer? For a while I’ve thought the advantage of hammer between two equally skilled players was around 60-40. (That is, against an equal opponent the player with hammer would win a single round 60% of the time.) This wasn’t based on any analysis, just a feeling really, and I had a feeling the hammer advantage for doubles play was slightly higher, maybe 65%.

Such an advantage for the hammer, if those percentages were accurate, is significant so it’s a good thing crokinole games are typically four rounds so that such an advantage is nullified. There is of course one exception, which is elimination matches where a tie is not an acceptable result.

A history of elimination formats

Thanks to a 1960 article on the Ontario Crokinole Championships, and to Howard Martin for digging it up, we know the concept of a “first to X points” race format is long familiar to crokinole.

The World Championships utilized a slightly more sophisticated approach, with a best of 3 games format with each game being a race to 5 points. The early years of the NCA saw many innovations for competitive crokinole, but the format used for nearly all championship matches remained identical to that of the World Championships.

Either format was widely considered acceptable for tournament elimination matches, however it was openly acknowledged that both formats presented an inherent advantage for one player. Under the circumstances of closely contested play, the championship match would be determined by one final round that would break a tie, and thus one player would have the hammer advantage for one additional round. But such a case seemed too rare to expend much energy correcting. After all, how likely was it that a first to 11 points match would be tied 10-10, or that a best of 3 games match would be tied 4-4 in the final game?

It turns out, it happens often enough.

The finals of both the 2011 (Ray Beierling winning over Eric Miltenburg) and 2012 London tournaments (Jason Beierling winning over Ray), as well as the 2012 World Championship final (Jon Conrad defeating Justin Slater) would all be decided with a sudden death round after the 3rd and final game was tied 4-4. In all three matches, the player with the hammer advantage was victorious.

No one was disputing the results of the matches, and generally all agreed it was exciting stuff, but people began to ponder if there was a better way. Only two years earlier a first round Wimbledon tennis match had made headlines by lasting 3 days and 11 hours of playtime. The length of the match was due to a rule that equalizes the number of games where each player has the advantage of serving. One of the players in the match, John Isner, has the second-highest percentage of service games won in the history of tennis, doing so 92% of the time. He also had a relatively poor winning percentage in return games, at around 10%, creating a perfect scenario for an extended match.

The Quinte Region Crokinole Club would be the first to come up with an idea to address crokinole’s hammer advantage, creating the Quinte Convention and running it at the 2012 Belleville Challenge, where it would be used immediately. The format was played as a best of 3 games but allowed any game to be tied 4-4. If after 3 games the players were tied with an equal number of games won and tied, then the match would be decided in successive 2-round mini-games. If one player managed a 4-0 or 3-1 win after each player received the hammer advantage for one round, then the match would be over. But if the score was 2-2, then another set of 2 rounds would be played. Both the semifinals of Jon Conrad vs Brian Cook, and Nathan Walsh vs Fred Slater would require 6 rounds of overtime crokinole to be played to determine a winner.

Around the same time Fred Slater came up with a format he dubbed the Wimbledon rule. It allowed the first two games of a best of 3 to be decided by a one-round tie-breaker, but if the final decisive game was tied 4-4, then successive 2-round mini-games would be utilized until a clear winner emerged.

Personally I greatly enjoyed both of these formats when they were introduced. I liked the idea of a thrilling close-fought battle on the crokinole board being stretched out a bit longer than you’d expect, like a thrilling tennis match or NHL overtime playoff game. But mostly I liked the idea of the equality the format brought to both players. If the hammer advantage would give one player a substantial 60-40 edge to win the match, then it made perfect sense to me to utilize a format that negates it.

Marathons

But then we started to see a few matches where the Wimbledon and Quinte Convention formats were used to their fullest, and I became less enthused.

In the 2013 Belleville B division final, Clare Kuepfer and Phil Somers played the equivalent of 5-games of crokinole and roughly 40 minutes to decide the match. At the 2013 Ontario Doubles Championship, Conrad/Snyder played Johnston/Johnston in a first to 10 points match with a Wimbledon tiebreaker. The match was eventually won 18-16, thanks to the foresight of tournament organizer Ray Beierling who declared the match would switch to sudden death at 16-16. The match took over an hour to complete. The B division semifinals of the 2018 Ontario Singles Championship was a WCC rematch with Robert Bonnett and Jon Conrad. The first to 9 points match should have captured the full attention of the audience as the match was tied 8-8, but spectators drifted away from the board as the Wimbledon rounds extended on and on. Eventually Conrad would win by a score of 18-14 after playing the equivalent of two full matches.

Such marathons caused some headaches for tournament organizers, and the Wimbledon and Quinte Conventions eventually faded from use; the last time it was employed was the 2020 Hamilton final.

Even if the format was fairer, I started to wonder if it was really worth the extra time and waning of spectator interest. From my commentator experience, I feel there is great value in simplicity. Tell your viewer the game is first to 9 points and that’s easy to understand. Tell them it’s a best of 3 games where each game is first to 5 points and they’ll probably still understand. Tell them it’s best of 3 games where each is first to 5, but they stop if it’s 4-4, and then if after all 3 games they are tied because they tied each game, or each won one game and tied the other then they have to keep playing until . . .

You get the point. Not super simple to explain.

And in the simplicity also comes the excitement. Tell the viewer it’s one game, one round, one goal to win the championship, and everyone immediately understands the importance of it. Sports fans love the idea of Game 7 in the playoffs, or sudden death overtime. That really only leaves one question.

Is the excitement worth the inequity?

Even if the advantage of the hammer in a round is worth a 20% edge (60% vs 40%), that does not mean that the player with the hammer has a 20% better chance to the win when the match starts.

If the strength of the hammer is actually 60%, then a race to 9 points format gives the player with potentially one extra hammer a winning chance of 53% against an equally skilled opponent. A 6% edge.

When you extend the match format to something longer, such as the WCC format, the hammer advantage shrinks to about 51.5% vs 48.5% (a 3% edge). Even from a player perspective, such an edge seems negligible in my mind. And from an entertainment perspective, the advantage didn’t seem worth negating at the cost of the sudden death round excitement.

What’s the real hammer strength?

The crokinolereference database has the round-by-round scores from over 5,000 games, and it has information on which player/team had the hammer for 3,000 of those games.

From that data, the advantage of the hammer for one round is 55-45 for singles, and 52-48 for doubles.

(For all images below, clicking of them will access a pdf of higher resolution.)

I found this a little surprising, as the advantage comes in less than I thought it would be for singles, and the doubles result shows the hammer is even less important than in singles (although the sample size is much smaller, and thus the conclusion is less credible).

A 55-45 hammer advantage further shrinks the pre-match advantage in a race to 9 points down to 51.3%-48.7%, and in the WCC format down to 50.6%-49.4%.

I began to wonder if the result would be different if the two players matched up were of equal skill, or if one player was dominant over another. The thought occurred to me that if one player was much stronger than another, then maybe the hammer wouldn’t be an advantage at all since the stronger player may just win every round regardless. Perhaps the existence of these games was skewing the data to show the hammer being less important than it was when two players were of equal skill.

To test this I utilized the ELO ratings I’ve published on crokinolereference, and pulled out the difference in ELO ratings for each game. This reduced the sample size to only singles matches of roughly 2,000 games. I then put all the results into buckets. The first being cases when one player has an ELO rating 200 points below their opponent, the next when the ELO rating is between 150 and 200 points below their opponent, etc.

As you can see, the percentage points scored, both when a player shoots first and when a player has the hammer, increases as their ELO rating is more favourable compared to their opponent. Obviously this makes sense, and at least shows the ELO rating can be used to predict match results.

What is surprising is that the hammer edge remains pretty level regardless of the skill gap between players. Even between matches of equally skilled players, and matches with one dominant player, the advantage of the hammer compared to the disadvantage of shooting first is roughly the same.

A couple of recent Tracey Boards' social media posts also looked at the advantage of the hammer. Analyzing the games from the 2023 WCC revealed it was the case that actually less rounds were won with the hammer.

It got me wondering if there were any tournaments in the database that bucked the 10% hammer edge trend.

There are a couple of tournaments that show hammer advantages much less or more than 10%. However the sample sizes for these events isn’t too substantial.

As one last piece of analysis I pulled out the results for a select collection of players, curious to see if there was any players who might be more or less favoured with the hammer. I’ve highlighted some of the highs and lows below.

There are a few players who on either end of the high/low spectrum, but there’s no one who’s drastically far away from the average 10% hammer advantage.

Where does the hammer advantage come from?

The Tracey Boards' post later pointed to the opening round 20 race being a bigger component of which player would win the round. They also found that the player with the hammer more frequently wins the 20 race, which is logical since the player shooting first is more likely to miss first simply because they are the first to shoot.

I decided to dust off some undergraduate math knowledge and calculate the percentage chance of winning the 20 race under varying open 20 proficiency of two players.

The below chart shows the percentage chance that the player with the hammer wins the 20 race, in cases when the player shooting first scores open 20s at the percentages shown in the rows, and the player with the hammer scores open 20s at the percentages shown in the columns.

These probabilities are calculated by conditioning on two geometric probability distributions and assuming the round consists of 8 discs.

The cells where the two players have equal proficiency are highlighted, and shows the hammer’s chance of winning the 20 race is at least 57%, with the advantage improving as the 20 proficiency decreases or increases from 80% success.

I had actually calculated this chart about 10 years ago, and it was the basis for my reasoning thinking the hammer had a 60-40 advantage. It seems to me that players are scoring open 20s with success between 60% and 80%, so I figured the hammer is probably winning the 20 race and the round about 60% of the time. With a similar line of thinking I thought the hammer advantage in doubles would be even higher because it seems to me that open 20% success decreases in that discipline.

Of course there’s more to crokinole than just winning the 20 race.

Taking a step back

August 26, 2023

I have decided to significantly reduce the amount of content I produce with CrokinoleCentre. More specifically I will no longer write post-tournament reports, and I will likely upload only a handful of videos each year.

I wanted to provide this advance notice to the crokinole community, in case anyone else feels compelled to pick up the baton.

I’m making this decision now because I’ve come to feel a weight of burden, purely of my own making, that I feel with performing these routine CrokinoleCentre tasks. Somewhere along the line I have convinced myself that it’s a necessity to publish a written report and every playoff video from every tournament I attend, and somewhere along the way I came to believe that delaying in any of these tasks was an act of laziness. In recent years I also came to be responsible for updating three other websites (that of the NCA, WCC and crokinolereference), all of which I wanted to do, so again there’s no one to blame but myself on that front.

The accumulation of all of this is that nowadays on bad days I feel annoyed and fatigued by the work, and even on good days I never feel a strong enthusiasm for it.

I’ve mentioned these feelings at times to other people, and I usually receive both positive and productive feedback, which praises the work I’ve done in the past and proposes solutions to current woes. However, mostly I just find the work tedious, which anyone with video editing or website experience can relate. I’ve done many things to increase efficiency, but it still takes me roughly 5 times the length of a video to complete the entire production, and it’s not really possible to share the workload across multiple editors because the video file sizes are too large to transfer. Meanwhile the tournament reports I write are somewhat formulaic in format, but still take a few hours to publish.

I’ve experienced all of these exact challenges before and for many years, but I find myself having less patience for them now. I used to chuckle when two players spontaneously selected a new location for their playoff match, after I had already framed my cameras perfectly to capture the match on a now empty board. It’s things like these that I’ve just grown sick of. I’m not quite sure of the reason, maybe it just comes with age.

I’ve also had it suggested to me that I monetize the videos, but money is not a motivator for me to do the work. I did do this briefly in 2017 and 2018 when a couple of videos went viral, and received about $3000 from it. It was nice to have, but after I used the funds to improve the CrokinoleCentre product (by purchasing another camera, a new editing software, and external hard drive), the videos were earning less than $100 per month and that to me was not enough to justify making the viewer experience worse. Even if the sum of money available increased, it has the potential to cause further tension as players and tournaments could rightfully claim some portion is duly owed to them.

I initially started making the crokinole videos because I wanted a video record of the World Championship match, and I was annoyed I couldn’t ever go back and watch Joe Fulop winning the title. I started the blog in the golden era of the medium, where thousands of well written and interesting blogs were available online to peruse. Mine was initially essentially a copy of a blog my brother wrote about his university cross country team.

But eventually CrokinoleCentre grew into a way for me to ensure that crokinole tournaments wouldn’t pass by and eventually be forgotten. I value the historic record and the ability to share stories about events years after they happened with people who were never there. Additionally it’s been nice to have people express that they’ve enjoyed a particular blog or video I’ve made. I’ve also taken joy from CrokinoleCentre work allowing people analyze and understand crokinole more. There used to be less than a handful of names that people recognized as strong crokinole players, and now there’s a long list. When I was in Hungary I was asked questions about dozens of Canadians that people enjoyed watching. It was heart-warming to know that I had played a part in making that connection.

Crokinole will probably always occupy a part of my idle mind. It used to be a joyful daydream from monotonous study or work, and it’s been fun pretending to be some reporter or columnist or commentator. But recently that part has been onerous; the cause of more work to be done, rather than some excitement to daydream about.

I definitely won’t be going anywhere. I’ll still be playing and volunteering, probably bring my camera to each tournament, and I’ll still make the odd video or blog (if no one else does it I’ll still ensure the championship matches are published at some point). But I want to free myself to do other things in crokinole I think I’d enjoy. “Taking a step back” from the limelight, but still doing my part in sustaining the game. I have accumulated a long list of ambitions, but like finishing your homework before playing video games, I’ve deferred these ambitions due to a feeling that I should finish the other routine stuff first. I don’t wish to defer them any longer.

Reinman Repeats in Turtle Island as Legend Returns

August 25, 2023

There was excited chatter when Dale Henry published a list of abbreviated names registered for the 9th Turtle Island Crokinole Championship. Included in it was “Brian C” which was quickly deduced to be the 4-time World Champion Brian Cook, who last played an NCA event in 2015, but has continued his spectacular chronicles in crokinole with prestigious titles in Hungary and the UK since then.

Some players strategically altered their morning practice, eagerly occupying the seat opposite Cook when it opened up in order to get some warm-up games against him and scout his quality and style of play. While Cook is an established player, the local crokinole scene has changed enough that the majority of players in attendance had never played against him. Among them were pre-tournament favourites Connor Reinman and Andrew Hutchinson, and there was a great deal of interest among the crowd regarding how Cook’s level would compare to the recent World Championship finalists.

Dale Henry began the day welcoming the crokinole crowd of 43 strong back to the Tuscarora Nation House for the first time since 2019. He took time as well to note the passing of Chief Leo Henry, and his mother Carolyn “Care” Henry, who had both enthusiastically attended all eight previous editions of the tournament. Throughout the day funds were raised for cancer research, most notably with an engraved crokinole disc, and donated to the Center for Indigenous Cancer Research at Roswell Park.

The donation cheque — Photo credit: Dale Henry

The competitive division had 24 players, and it was a pretty strong field with only room for 8 in the afternoon A group. Ray Beierling had the top score of 63 points in 10 games, one ahead of Reinman and Hutchinson. Walsh scored the most 20s with 110, and finished with 53 points for 5th, behind Jeremy Tracey and ahead of Travis Keener.

Simon Dowrick scored 50 points for 7th; his score boosted by an 8-0 win he recorded against Brian Cook. But that didn’t stop Cook for taking the final spot in group A, with 48 points and 94 20s, just ahead of Jason Beierling’s 48 points and 81 20s. Cook and Jason Beierling met in the preliminary round and drew their game 4-4 as well, showing the margins for the cut-off of the top group were precariously slim.

To remain in contention for the tournament victory the players had to finish in the top 4 of the 8 player group A, so the common line of thinking was that an even score of 28 points would be right around the cut-off for the playoffs.

Hutchinson had a tremendous start and found himself at 28 points after only 5 of the 7 games. In those first 5 games he even had a 0-8 loss to Ray Beierling, but was buoyed by 8-0 wins over Reinman and Dowrick, and a 7-1 win over Tracey. He would finish first in the group with 38 points.

Ray Beierling lost his opening game to Travis Keener 6-2, but rebounded with that aforementioned win against Hutchinson. With 28 points going into the final game he cemented his playoff spot with an 8-0 win against Jeremy Tracey.

Brian Cook had a steady round and sat 4th or 5th in the standings throughout the entirety of the round. A final 4-4 draw against Hutchinson would give him 30 points for 3rd place.

The final playoff position came down to the last game with Reinman having the edge at 27 points, Tracey sitting right behind at 26, and Walsh further back at 22 points thanks to an 0-8 loss at the hands of Tracey. Ray Beierling eliminated Tracey with an 8-0 win in the last game, and Reinman almost met the same fate as he trailed Walsh 0-6, but Reinman got the final 2 points to finish with 29 points to Walsh’s 28 for the 4th playoff entry.

That setup semifinals that were rematches of the 2011 and 2023 World Championships, and in both cases the winners would repeat in Tuscarora. Ray Beierling trailed Brian Cook 2-6 in the race to 9 points, but started to chain open 20s together at the precise moment when Cook struggled make any open 20s, leading to a comeback 10-6 win for Beierling.

The Hutchinson vs Reinman semifinal was tense throughout. At 4-4 there was a late round 20 race, with Hutchinson missing the hammer open 20 shot to go down 4-6. Immediately after another late round 20 race saw Hutchinson miss his final shot as well, but Reinman botched a relatively routine takeout to instead tie the round to make the score 7-5, rather than a commanding 8-4. Hutchinson pushed the match to 7-7, but Reinman prevailed in the last round for a 9-7 win.

The championship game had a couple nice shots, but lacked the suspense and entertainment of the semifinals. Reinman had found his groove in 20s and was scoring comfortably. Beierling was also racking up a good number but couldn’t get his foot in the door and trailed 8-0. Beierling did prevent a shutout, but ultimately lost 10-2 as Reinman defended his 2019 Turtle Island victory and picked up his 7th NCA tournament win.